In scenarios such as unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) aerial photography, inspection, mapping, and emergency rescue, the stability and real-time performance of high-definition video transmission directly determine the success or failure of the mission. When the industry is confronted with the technical divergence between 3G-SDI output and network output, how should engineers make their choices?
This article conducts an in-depth analysis from three dimensions: the essence of transmission, scene adaptation, and technical bottlenecks, to help you find the optimal solution.
I. Transmission Essence: Lossless Transmission vs. Compression Coding
1.3G-SDI output: Lossless picture quality
3G-SDI uses uncompressed digital signal transmission and directly transmits the original video stream through coaxial cables. It supports 1080P60fps lossless picture quality, and its color reproduction and detail retention capabilities far exceed those of compressed transmission.
For example, in power inspection, the 3G-SDI output of the unmanned aerial vehicle can clearly capture tiny defects such as cracks and insulator damage in transmission lines, avoiding noise interference caused by compression algorithms.
Technical highlights
Low latency: Almost no transmission latency, meeting the requirements of real-time control;
Strong anti-interference: Differential signal transmission technology can resist electromagnetic interference and work stably in industrial plants and near high-voltage lines.
2. Network output: Flexible and efficient
The network output compresses the video stream through H.264/H.265/MJPEG to reduce bandwidth usage and supports the expansion of 4G and WiFi functional modules. For instance, during live broadcasts of large-scale events, network drones can transmit 4K images in real time back to the cloud, allowing viewers to watch them via their mobile phones.
Technical highlights
Low-cost deployment: Utilize existing 4G and WIFI networks without the need to lay dedicated cables.
Intelligent integration: Can embed AI algorithms to achieve functions such as target recognition and automatic tracking;
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multi-platform access including Windows, Linux and mobile devices.
Ii. Scene Adaptation: Industrial-grade Demands vs. Consumer-grade Applications
1. 3G-SDI output: A hardcore player in the industrial field
Power inspection: A certain power grid company adopted a video solution of SONY FCB-EV9520L+3G-SDI interface board to inspect transmission lines with drones. Through 3G-SDI lossless transmission, fine cracks were clearly identified, and the accuracy of fault location was greatly improved.
Emergency rescue: In earthquake-stricken areas, the 3G-SDI output of unmanned aerial vehicles can penetrate smoke and electromagnetic interference, providing real-time disaster situation images for the command center and assisting in formulating rescue plans.
2. Network output: The cost-effective choice for the consumer industry
Agricultural plant protection: Plant protection drones transmit images of farmland via 4G networks, and AI algorithms analyze the growth of crops to guide precise spraying and reduce the use of pesticides.
Logistics and distribution: A certain e-commerce enterprise uses network drones for delivery, monitors the status of packages in real time, and enhances the customer experience.
Iii. Technical Bottleneck: Distance Limitation vs. Compromise on Picture Quality
1.Challenges of 3G-SDI output:
Limited transmission distance: The transmission distance of 3G-SDI coaxial cables is approximately 100 meters. Although optical fibers can be extended to 10 kilometers, the cost is high.
Complex wiring: The coordination of multiple aircraft requires the laying of a large number of cables, which affects the maneuverability of the unmanned aerial vehicle.
Insufficient scalability: Difficult to integrate AI algorithms, and functions rely on back-end processing.
2. Pain points of network output:
Image quality loss: Although H.264/H.265/MJPEG compression reduces bandwidth, the rate of detail loss is relatively high.
Latency fluctuation: Under 4G networks, the latency is relatively large, affecting real-time control.
Security risk: Public networks are vulnerable to hacker attacks and require additional encryption measures.
Iv. Future Trends: Integration and Symbiosis
1. The evolutionary direction of SDI
Wireless: Achieve wireless transmission of SDI signals through millimeter-wave technology, breaking through distance limitations;
Intelligentization: Integrating edge computing chips to achieve front-end AI analysis and reduce back-end pressure.
2. Breakthrough paths for the Network:
5G network: Increase bandwidth to 10Gbps, reduce latency, and approach SDI real-time performance as closely as possible;
AVI encoding: A new generation of lossless compression algorithm, significantly enhancing picture quality under the same bandwidth.
Conclusion: There is no absolute superiority or inferiority; there is only scene adaptation
Choose SDI output: If you are pursuing lossless picture quality, low latency, strong anti-interference, and have a sufficient budget (such as industrial inspection, emergency rescue);
Select network output: If flexible deployment, low-cost operation and maintenance, intelligent integration are required, and a certain compromise on picture quality is accepted (such as in agriculture and logistics).
Ultimate advice: In today’s era of accelerated integration of 5G and AI technologies, the drone industry is evolving from a “single transmission” to a “hybrid architecture”. Engineers should flexibly combine SDI and network technologies based on task requirements to create the next-generation video transmission system that is “high-definition + real-time + intelligent”.